Vol. 19 No. 3 (2015)
HEART RHYTHM DISORDERS

Neurotoxic denervation of the left atrium for atrial fibrillation treatment and prevention: an experimental animal study

A. Strelnikov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
D. Losik
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
D. Sergeyevichev
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
I. Zykov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
S. Abashkin
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Romanov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
Ye. Pokushalov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio

Published 2015-10-27

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation,
  • botulinum toxin,
  • autonomic nervous system

How to Cite

Strelnikov, A., Losik, D., Sergeyevichev, D., Zykov, I., Abashkin, S., Romanov, A., & Pokushalov, Y. (2015). Neurotoxic denervation of the left atrium for atrial fibrillation treatment and prevention: an experimental animal study. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 19(3), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-94-99

Abstract

Objective. The key element of the onset and progression of atrial fibrillation is an autonomic nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the electrophysiological efficacy and periprocedural safety of Type A botulinum toxin, the preparation that safely blocks the conduction without any serious complications.
Methods. 30 mini pigs (weight 15-20 kg), were randomized into two groups. The first group (n = 15) received botulinum toxin injected in the projection of ANS ganglion plexus of the left atrium, while 0.9% sodium chloride solution was administered in the same zones of animals of the second (control) group (n = 15). Electrophysiological examination of the left atrium and procedure safety was carried out at baseline and 7, 14, 21, 30 days of follow-up.
Results. 24 (80%) out of 30 animals survived. All exclusions were not related with the injection procedure. No significant complications, vital functional disorders, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction or a high level of cardiac toxic markers were observed in both groups. Starting from 7 to 30 days after the procedure we observed the statistically significant difference between the left atrium effective refractory period of the botulinum toxin and control group (12.4±3.5% versus 31.2±5.6%, p<0.001, respectively) on the 30th day. Also noticeable was AF inducibility reduction only in the botulinum toxin group: at baseline 71±107%; on the 30th day 41±11.4% (p<0.001).
Conclusion. The epicardial botulinum toxin injection into the main projections of the left atrium autonomic nervous system is an effective and safe method reducing vulnerability of the myocardium to AF.

References

  1. Scherlag B., Nakagawa H., Jackman W. et al. Electrical Stimulation to Identify Neural Elements on the Heart: Their Role in Atrial Fibrillation // J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005. Vol. 13. P. 37–42.
  2. Hou Y., Scherlag B.J., Lin J. et al. Ganglionated plexi modulate extrinsic cardiac autonomic nerve input: effects on sinus rate, atrioventricular conduction, refractoriness, and inducibility of atrial fibrillation // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 50 P. 61–68.
  3. Schauerte P., Scherlag B.J., Pitha J., et al. Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation // Circulation. 2000. Vol. 102. P. 2774–2780.
  4. Lemola K., Chartier D., Yeh Y.H. et al. Pulmonary vein region ablation in experimental vagal atrial fibrillation: role of pulmonary veins versus autonomic ganglia // Circulation. 2008. Vol. 117. P. 470–477.
  5. Katritsis D.G., Giazitzoglou E., Pokushalov E., et al. Rapid pulmonary vein isolation combined with autonomic ganglia modification: a randomized study // Heart Rhythm. 2011. Vol. 8. P. 672–676,
  6. Zhou Q., Hou Y., Yang S. A Meta-Analysis of the Comparative Efficacy of Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with and without Ablation of the Ganglionated Plexi // Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2011. Vol. 34. P. 1687–94.
  7. Calkins H., Kuck K.H., Cappato R. et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design // Europace. 2012. Vol.14. P. 528–606.
  8. Montecucco C., Schiavo G., Tugnoli V., de Grandis D. Botulinum neurotoxins: mechanism of action and therapeutic applications. // Mol. Med. Today. 1996. V. 2. P. 418–424.
  9. Sheng Chen et al. Clinical Uses of Botulinum Neurotoxins: Current Indications,Limitations and Future Developments // Toxins. 2012. Vol. 4. P. 913–939.
  10. Lu Z., Scherlag B.J., Lin J., Niu G., Fung K.M., Zhao L., Ghias M., Jackman W.M., Lazzara R., Jiang H., Po S.S. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation: autonomic mechanism for atrial electrical remodeling induced by short-term rapid atrial pacing // Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2008. Vol. 1. P. 184–192.
  11. Po S.S., Nakagawa H., Jackman W.M. et al. Localization of left atrial ganglionated plexi in patients with atrial fibrillation // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2009. Vol. 20. P. 1186 –1189.
  12. Pokushalov E., Romanov A., Artyomenko S. et al. Ganglionated plexi ablation directed by high-frequency stimulation and complex fractionated atrial electrograms for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation // Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2012. Vol. 35. P. 776–84.
  13. Danik S., Neuzil P., Avila A. et al. Evaluation of catheter ablation of periatrial ganglionic plexi in patients with atrial fibrillation // Am. J. Cardiol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 578–583.
  14. Pokushalov E. et al. The role of autonomic denervation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation // Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2008. Vol. 23. P. 55–9.
  15. Pokushalov E., Romanov A., Katritsis D.G., Artyomenko S., Shirokova N., Karaskov A., Mittal S., Steinberg J.S. Ganglionated Plexi Ablation vs Linear Ablation in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent/Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Comparison // Heart Rhythm. 2013. Vol. 10. P. 1280–6.
  16. Katritsis D.G., Pokushalov E., Romanov A., Po S.S. et al. Autonomic Denervation Added to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013. Vol. 62. P. 2318–25.
  17. Артеменко С.Н., Романов А.Б., Стрельников А.Г. и др. // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2013. № 1. C. 33–37.
  18. Чернявский А.М, Карева Ю.Е., Покушалов Е.А. и др. // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2014. № 1. C. 14–19.