Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013)
CASE REPORTS

The first experience with the implantation of the prosthesis xenopericardial frame variable stiffness "Tiara" in the aortic position

PDF (Русский)
  • D. Astapov,
  • D. Demidov,
  • Ye. Semenova,
  • S. Zheleznev,
  • I. Zorina,
  • Ya. Syrtseva
D. Astapov
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
D. Demidov
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
Ye. Semenova
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
S. Zheleznev
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
I. Zorina
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
Ya. Syrtseva
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2013-2-73-75

Published 2013-05-15

Keywords

  • HEART FAILURE,
  • AORTIC VALVE,
  • BIOPROSTHESES,
  • HEART VALVE DISEASE

How to Cite

Astapov, D., Demidov, D., Semenova, Y., Zheleznev, S., Zorina, I., & Syrtseva, Y. (2013). The first experience with the implantation of the prosthesis xenopericardial frame variable stiffness "Tiara" in the aortic position. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 17(2), 73–75. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2013-2-73-75

Copyright (c) 2013 Astapov D.A., Demidov D.P., Semenova Ye.I., Zheleznev S.I., Zorina I.G., Syrtseva Ya.V.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Represents the results of a clinical trial implantation xenopericardial prosthesis mounted on a frame of variable stiffness "Tiara" in the aortic position. Prosthesis implanted in a single-row suture cubcoronary supraannulary position. Implantation performed two patients 71 and 75 years with a good clinical outcome. According to the control echocardiography peak gradients at rest were 9-15 mm Hg. According to the results of a clinical trial prosthesis can be recommended for implementation in everyday clinical practice.
PDF (Русский)

References

  1. Астапов Д.А., Караськов А.М., Исаян М.В. и др. // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2012. № 1. С. 23-26.
  2. ГОСТ Р 52379-2005. Надлежащая клиническая практика. Введ. 2006. 01. 01. М.: Стандартинформ. 39 с.
  3. Караськов А.М., Астапов Д.А., Семенова Е.И. и др. // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2011. № 4. С. 23-28.
  4. Караськов А.М., Барбараш Л.С., Семенов И.И. и др. // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2007. № 3. С. 15-19.
  5. Albert A., Florath I., Rosendahl U. et al. // J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2007. V. 2. Р. 40. http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/2/1/40.
  6. Clavel M.A., Webb J.G., Rodes-Cabau J. et al. // Circulation. 2010. V. 9. P. 1928-1936.
  7. Doss M., Sirat S., Kiessling A.H. et al. // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2012. V. 21 (6). P. 753-757.
  8. Doss M., Martens S., Wood J.P. et al. // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003. V. 23 (3). P. 299-304.
  9. Fraccaro S., Napodano M., Tarantini G. et al. // JACC. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009. V. 2 (9). P. 828-833.
  10. Gublins H., Reichenspurner H. // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009. V. 88 (6). P. 2061-2008.
  11. Kobayashi J. // Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2011. V. 7. P. 345-351.
  12. Maciejewski M., Piestrzeniewicz K., Bielecka-Dabrowa A. et al. // Arch. Med. Sci. 2011. V. 7 (6). P. 993-999.
  13. Vrandecic M., Fantini F.A., Filho B.G. et al. // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2000. V. 18 (1). P. 46-53.