Vol. 25 No. 1 (2021)
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASES

Analysis of direct results of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery

PDF (Русский)
  • M.L. Gordeev,
  • V.K. Grebennik,
  • I.K. Ismail-zade,
  • G.I. Ishmukhametov,
  • I.Yu. Ivanov,
  • N.R. Abutalimova,
  • D.G. Zavarzina
M.L. Gordeev
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
V.K. Grebennik
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
I.K. Ismail-zade
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Bio
G.I. Ishmukhametov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
I.Yu. Ivanov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
N.R. Abutalimova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
D.G. Zavarzina
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2021-1-85-96

Published 2021-04-02

Keywords

  • cardiopulmonary bypass,
  • ischaemic heart disease,
  • myocardial revascularisation,
  • redo coronary artery bypass grafting

How to Cite

Gordeev, M., Grebennik, V., Ismail-zade, I., Ishmukhametov, G., Ivanov, I., Abutalimova, N., & Zavarzina, D. (2021). Analysis of direct results of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 25(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2021-1-85-96

Copyright (c) 2021 Gordeev M.L., Grebennik V.K., Ismail-zade I.K., Ishmukhametov G.I., Ivanov I.Yu., Abutalimova N.R., Zavarzina D.G.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Aim. To compare the immediate results of treatment of patients after redo coronary artery bypass grafting (reCABG) off pump and with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Methods. The retrospective study included 138 patients who underwent isolated reCABG for recurrence of angina pectoris in the period of 2013 to 2019 at the Almazov Research Centre. The operation was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass using isothermal blood cardioplegia in 74 cases (group A). Sixty-four operations were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass (group B). The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (e.g. myocardial infarction, acute cerebrovascular accident, cardiovascular death) during hospitalisation. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular failure, respiratory failure, renal failure, and wound healing complications during hospitalisation.
Results. Redo CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass compared with CABG off pump was more often complicated by cardiovascular failure (39.2% versus 20.3%, p = 0.043), respiratory failure (7.8% versus 2.7%, p = 0.047), and postpericardiotomy syndrome (13.5% versus 0%, p = 0.047). The revascularisation index was higher in the group of reCABG off pump (2.9) compared to the group of reCABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (2.4). In the early postoperative period there was a decrease in the duration of inpatient treatment and stay in the intensive care unit, the duration of surgery, as well as a lower incidence of postoperative complications in group B.
Conclusion. Redo CABG showed satisfactory results in the early postoperative period. Performing reCABG off pump was advantageous and was associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative complications.

Received 23 June 2020. Revised 9 September 2020. Accepted 10 September 2020.

Funding: The study did not have sponsorship.

Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions
Conception and design: I.K. Ismail-zade, V.K. Grebennik
Data collection and analysis: I.K. Ismail-zade, D.G. Zavarzina, N.R. Abutalimova
Drafting the article: I.K. Ismail-zade, I.Yu. Ivanov, G.I. Ishmukhametov
Critical revision of the article: V.K. Grebennik, M.l. Gordeev
Final approval of the version to be published: M.L. Gordeev, V.K. Grebennik, I.K. Ismail-zade, G.I. Ishmukhametov, I.Yu. Ivanov, N.R. Abutalimova, D.G. Zavarzina

PDF (Русский)

References

  1. Гордеев М.Л., Дьяченко Я.А., Гребенник В.К., Исмаил-заде И.К. Современные тенденции выбора материала для шунтирования при многососудистом поражении коронарных артерий. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2018;60(3):194-200. [Gordeev M.L., D'yachenko Ya.A., Grebennik V.K., Ismail-zade I.K. Trends in graft decision making in multiarterial coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Grudnaya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya = Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2018;60(3):194-200. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2018-60-3-194-200
  2. Czerny M., Zimpfer D., Kilo J., Gottardi R., Dunkler D., Wolner E., Grimm M. Coronary reoperations: recurrence of angina and clinical outcome with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(3):847-852. PMID: 12645705. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04652-0
  3. Гребенник В.К., Кучеренко В.С., Фань Х., Гордеев М.Л. Повторное аортокоронарное шунтирование. Риски и результаты. Вестник Национального медико-хирургического Центра им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2018;13(3)20-24. [Grebennik V.K., Kucherenko V.S., Fany H., Gordeev M.L. Redo coronary artery bypass graft. Risk and results. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2018;13(3)20-24. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.25881/BPNMSC.2018.85.15.004
  4. Di Mauro M., Iacò A.L., Contini M., Teodori G., Vitolla G., Pano M., Di Giammarco G., Calafiore A.M. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(1):81-87. PMID: 15620920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.058
  5. Masroor S., Katariya K., Yassin S., Tehrani H., Salerno T. Redo-OPCAB via left thoracotomy using symmetry aortic connector system: a report of two cases. J Card Surg. 2004;19(1):51-53. PMID: 15108791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04011.x
  6. Mack M.J. Off-pump surgery and alternatives to standard operation in redo coronary surgery. J Card Surg. 2004;19(4):313-319. PMID: 15245460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.4056_11.x
  7. Schütz A., Mair H., Wildhirt S.M., Gillrath G., Lamm P., Kilger E., Reichart B. Re-OPCAB vs. Re-CABG for myocardial revascularization. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;49(3):144-148. PMID: 11432471. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-14290
  8. Sisillo E., Marino M.R., Juliano G., Beverini C., Salvi L., Alamanni F. Comparison of on pump and off pump coronary surgery: risk factors for neurological outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31(6):1076-1080. PMID: 17408960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.02.015
  9. Vohra H.A., Bahrami T., Farid S., Mafi A., Dreyfus G., Amrani M., Gaer J.A.R. Propensity score analysis of early and late outcome after redo off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(2):209-214. PMID: 18180164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.11.011
  10. Cosgrove D.M. 3rd. Is coronary reoperation without the pump an advantage? Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55(2):329. PMID: 8431034. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90990-y
  11. Yaku H., Doi K. Redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(8):453-460. PMID: 24906816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0426-6
  12. Valgimigli M., Agostoni P., Biondi Zoccai G.G.L. Complete myocardial revascularization: between myth and reality. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(17):1809-1810. PMID: 15987705. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi403
  13. BARI Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(15):1600-1606. PMID: 17433949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.048
  14. Vander Salm T.J., Kip K.E., Jones R.H., Schaff H.V., Shemin R.J., Aldea G.S., Detre K.M. What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization? Answers from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol.2002;39(4):565-572. PMID: 11849852. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01806-x
  15. Deppe A.-C., Arbash W., Kuhn E.W., Slottosch I., Scherner M., Liakopoulos O.J., Choi Y.-H., Wahlers T. Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(4):1031-1041. PMID: 26276839. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv268
  16. Dieberg G., Smart N.A., King N. On-vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:201-211. PMID: 27541655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.250
  17. Yau T.M., Borger M.A., Weisel R.D., Ivanov J. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120(1):156-163. PMID: 10884669. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.106983
  18. Tugtekin S.M., Alexiou K., Kappert U., Esche H., Joskowiak D., Knaut M., Matschke K. Coronary reoperation with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95(2):93-98. PMID: 16598517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0335-5
  19. Trehan N., Mishra Y.K., Malhotra R., Sharma K.K., Mehta Y., Shrivastava S. Off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(3):1026-1029. PMID: 11016368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01775-6
  20. Lamy A., Devereaux P.J., Prabhakaran D., Taggart D.P., Hu S., Straka Z., Piegas L.S., Avezum A., Akar A.R., Lanas Zanetti F., Jain A.R., Noiseux N., Padmanabhan C., Bahamondes J.-C., Novick R.J., Tao L., Olavegogeascoechea P.A., Airan B., Sulling T.-A., Whitlock R.P., Ou Y., Gao P., Pettit S., Yusuf S., CORONARY Investigators. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med. 2015;375(24):2359-2368. PMID: 27771985. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1601564
  21. Mishra Y.K., Collison S.P., Malhotra R., Kohli V., Mehta Y., Trehan N. Ten-year experience with single-vessel and multivessel reoperative off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(3):527-532. PMID: 18329464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.019
  22. Stamou S.C., Pfister A.J., Dangas G., Dullum M.K., Boyce S.W., Bafi A.S., Garcia J.M., Corso P.J. Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(5):1383-1387. PMID: 10881809. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01177-2
  23. Rufa M.I., Ursulescu A., Nagib R., Shanmuganathan S., Albert M., Reichert S., Franke U.F.W. Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: A propensity score analysis of long-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(2):447-456.e2. PMID: 31229294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.122