Vol. 18 No. 1 (2014)
ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTICS

Assessment of right ventricular geometry and function from real time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and implanted intracardiac devices

V. Skidan
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; Far-Eastern State Medical University
Bio
D. Tomas
Cleveland Clinic
Bio
V. Bondar
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; Far-Eastern State Medical University
Bio

Published 2014-02-28

Keywords

  • THREE-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY,
  • SYSTOLIC FUNCTION,
  • HEART FAILURE,
  • REAL-TIME,
  • RIGHT VENTRICLE

How to Cite

Skidan, V., Tomas, D., & Bondar, V. (2014). Assessment of right ventricular geometry and function from real time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and implanted intracardiac devices. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 18(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2014-1-52-57

Abstract

This study was designed to compare two methods for quantifying right ventricular (RV) geometry and function obtained from real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and implanted intracardiac devices. 42 patients (29 men and 13 women) aged 29 to 78 years with acute heart failure were included into the research. Three-dimensional reconstruction RT-4DE Tom Tec revealed several advantages in determining the volume and right ventricular function in comparison with 4-D LV Echo PAC program in cases of complicated geometry of endocardial contour of the right ventricle.

References

  1. Скидан В.И., Боровски А., Парк М., Томаш Дж., Воронина Н.В. // ДМЖ. 2011. Т. 3. С. 6-10.
  2. Скидан В.И., Боровски А., Парк М. // Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2012. № 1. С. 52-67.
  3. Marwick T. et al. // Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2008. V. 1. P. 58-89.
  4. Chua S., Levine R.A. et al. // Eur. J. Echocard. 2009. V. 10. P. 619-624.
  5. Rudski L. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocard. 2010. V. 23. P. 685-713.
  6. Horton K. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocard. 2009. V. 22. P. 776-792.
  7. Tamborini G. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocard. 2010. V. 23. P. 109-115.
  8. Jenkins C. et al. // Chest. 2007. V. 131. P. 1844-1851.
  9. Gopal A. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocard. 2007. V. 20. P. 445-455.
  10. Leibundgut G., Rohner A., Grize L., Bernheim A. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiography. 2010. V. 23. P. 116-126.
  11. Niemann P.S., Pinho L., Balbach T., Galuschky C. et al. // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23. 2007. V. 50. P. 1668-1673.
  12. Nesser H. et al. // Echocard. 2006. V. 23. P. 666-680.
  13. Vogel M., Gutberlet M. et al. // Heart. 1997. V. 78. P. 127-130.
  14. Grison A. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocard. 2007. V. 20. P. 921-929.
  15. Kjaergaard J. et al. // Eur. J. Echocard. 2006. V. 7. P. 430-438.
  16. Mor-Avi V. et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocard. 2010. V. 23 (2). P. 141-143.
  17. Shiota T. // Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2009. V. 24. P. 410-415.
  18. Sheehan F., Redington A. // Heart. 2008. V. 94. P. 1510-1515.
  19. Tulevski Y. et al. // Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2002. V. 18. P. 41-51.
  20. Skidan V., Borowski A., Thomas J. // Poster: 44640. Congress: ESCR 2010, Prague 28-30.10.2010. Topic: ESCR 2010.
  21. Skidan V., Borowski A., Park M., Thomas J. // EUROECHO & other Imaging Modalities. Budapest 2-5 December 2011. Accepted Poster Presentation # 51186.