Vol. 21 No. 4 (2017)
ANGIOLOGY & VASCULAR SURGERY

Predictors of adverse events in the mid-term postoperative period in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy

PDF (Русский)
  • R. Tarasov,
  • A. Kazantsev,
  • A. Shabaev,
  • A. Mironov,
  • N. Burkov,
  • A. Anufriyev,
  • L. Barbarash
R. Tarasov
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
A. Kazantsev
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Shabaev
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
A. Mironov
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
N. Burkov
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
A. Anufriyev
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
L. Barbarash
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2017-4-50-58

Published 2017-12-28

Keywords

  • carotid endarterectomy,
  • unfavorable prognosis factors,
  • peripheral atherosclerosis

How to Cite

Tarasov, R., Kazantsev, A., Shabaev, A., Mironov, A., Burkov, N., Anufriyev, A., & Barbarash, L. (2017). Predictors of adverse events in the mid-term postoperative period in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 21(4), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2017-4-50-58

Copyright (c) 2017 Tarasov R.S., Kazantsev A.N., Shabaev A.R., Mironov A.V., Burkov N.N., Anufriyev A.I., Barbarash L.S.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Aim. Emphasis in the study was placed on the identification of unfavorable prognosis factors associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEE) during mid-term follow-up.
Methods. Over a period from 2015 to 2016, 222 CEE operations were performed. Most patients (n = 190; 85.5%) underwent CEE using a patch of xenopericardium, 14.4% (n = 32) received eversion CEE, and a temporary shunt was used in 14.4% (n = 32). Hybrid revascularization in the volume of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) + CEE was performed in 9.9% (n = 22) patients. The groups under study were compared by using a chi-square test followed by subsequent analysis of the shares, or if ordinal characters or quantitative traits with a distribution different from the normal one occurred—by using a Mann – Whitney U-test. Correction of multiple comparisons was done by calculating an average fraction of false discoveries of the hypotheses (false discovery rate). The analysis of prognostic factors was done using the odds ratio (OR) by means of the 2 × 2 tables.
Results. Among the complications detected in the mid-term follow-up, the most common adverse event was the development of MI in 3.6% (n = 8) of patients. According to color duplex scanning of brachiocephalic arteries, restenosis of the operated ICA was observed in 4.5% of patients. The following risk factors significantly increased the risk of adverse events: angina pectoris II–III functional class (OR = 3.84%, CI = 1.24–11.9), SYNTAX Score >22 (OR = 2.83, CI = 1.137–7.086).
Conclusion. Based on the results of a single-center prospective retrospective study, significant risk factors for adverse outcome in the mid-term postoperative period were identified.

Received 10 May 2017. Revised 27 September 2017. Accepted 5 October 2017.

Funding: The research was done with support of the grant (No. 12090ГУ/2017) awarded by the Fund for Facilitation of Innovations within the framework of the “Umnik-2016” project (Kemerovo).

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions
Conception and study design: R.S. Tarasov, A.I. Anufriyev
Data collection and analysis: A.R. Shabaev
Drafting the article: A.N. Kazantsev, N.N. Burkov
Critical revision of the article: A.V. Mironov
Final approval of the version to be published: L.S. Barbarash

PDF (Русский)

References

  1. European Stroke Organisation, Tendera M., Aboyans V., Bartelink M.L., Baumgartner I., Clément D., Collet J.P., Cremonesi A., De Carlo M., Erbel R., Fowkes F.G., Heras M., Kownator S., Minar E., Ostergren J., Poldermans D., Riambau V., Roffi M., Röther J., Sievert H., van Sambeek M., Zeller T.; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22):2851-906. PMID: 21873417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr211
  2. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями брахиоцефальных артерий. Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2013;19(2 Приложение):1-69. Режим доступа: http://www.angiolsurgery.org/recommendations/2013/recommendations_brachiocephalic.pdf [National guidelines on the management of patients with diseases of brachiocephalic arteries. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya = Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2013;19(2 Suppl):1-69. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.angiolsurgery.org/recommendations/2013/recommendations_brachiocephalic.pdf]
  3. Синьков М.А., Ганюков В.И. Эффективность первичного чрескожного коронарного вмешательства у больных инфарктом миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST и сопутствующим мультифокальным атеросклерозом. Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2013;(3):57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-3-57-61 [Sinkov M.A., Ganyukov V.I. Effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with st segment elevation myocardial infarction and polyvascular artery disease. Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniy = Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2013;(3):57-61. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-3-57-61]
  4. Найден Т.В., Бартош-Зеленая С.Ю. Оценка сердечно-сосудистого риска у мужчин среднего возраста с мультифокальным атеросклерозом и метаболическим синдромом. Здоровье — основа человеческого потенциала: проблемы и пути их решения. 2013;8(1):417-419. [Naiden T.V., Bartosh-Zelenaya S.Yu. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in middle aged men with multifocal atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome. Health – the basis of human potential: problems and ways to solve them. 2013;8(1):417-419. (In Russ.)]
  5. Грачева С.А., Бирагова М.С., Глазунова А.М., Клефортова И.И., Мелкозеров К.В., Шамхалова М.Ш., Джавелидзе М.И., Солдатова Т.В., Ильин А.В., Деев А.Д., Шестакова М.В., Тугеева Э.Ф., Бузиашвили Ю.И. Распространенность и факторы риска атеросклеротического поражения экстракоронарных артерий у больных сахарным диабетом с подтвержденным коронароангиосклерозом. Кардиология. 2014:54(2):18-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/cardio.2014.2.18-25 [Gracheva S.A., Biragova M.S., Glazunova A.M., Klefortova I.I., Melkozerov K.V., Shamkhalova M.Sh., Dzhavelidze M.I., Soldatova T.V., Ilin A.V., Deev A.D., Shestakova M.V., Tugeeva E.F., Buziashvili U.I. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Extra-cCronary Artery Disease in Patients with Diabetes with Confirmed Atherosclerosis of Coronary Arteries. Kardiologiia = Cardiology. 2014;54(2):18-25. (In Russ.) https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/cardio.2014.2.18-25]
  6. Mousa А., Broce М. Carotid endarterectomy before and after CREST. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2016;23(3):536-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816640817
  7. Hopkins L.N. Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead – in phase. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19(2):153-62. PMID: 20189092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.001
  8. Brott T.G., Hobson R.W. 2nd, Howard G., Roubin G.S., Clark W.M., Brooks W., Mackey A., Hill M.D., Leimgruber P.P., Sheffet A.J., Howard V.J., Moore W.S., Voeks J.H., Hopkins L.N., Cutlip D.E., Cohen D.J., Popma J.J., Ferguson R.D., Cohen S.N., Blackshear J.L., Silver F.L., Mohr J.P., Lal B.K., Meschia J.F., CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):11-23. PMID: 20505173. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0912321
  9. Hobson R.W., Howard V.J., Roubin G.S., Brott T.G., Ferguson R.D., Popma J.J., Graham D.L., Howard G., CREST Investigators. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1106-11. PMID: 15622363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022
  10. Boulanger M., Camelière L., Felgueiras R., Berger L., Rerkasem K., Rothwell P.M., Touzé E. Periprocedural myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy and stenting: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46(10):2843-8. PMID: 26286540. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010052
  11. Vaniyapong T., Chongruksut W. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD000126. PMID: 24353155. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000126.pub4
  12. Aiello F.A., Shue B., Kini N., Rosen A., Messina L., Robinson W., Gona P., Schanzer A. Outcomes reported by the Vascular Quality Initiative and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not comparable. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(1):152-9,159.e1-3. PMID: 24630871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.046
  13. Siracuse J.J., Gill H.L., Schneider D.B., Graham A.R., Connolly P.H., Jones D.W., Meltzer A.J. Assessing the perioperative safety of common femoral endarterectomy in the endovascular era. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014;48(1):27-33. PMID: 24142958. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574413508827
  14. Meschia J.F., Hopkins L.N., Altafullah I., Wechsler L.R., Stotts G., Gonzales N.R., Voeks J.H., Howard G., Brott T.G. Time from symptoms to carotid endarterectomy or stenting and perioperative risk. Stroke. 2015;46(12):3540-2. PMID: 26493675. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011123.
  15. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialist’s Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1991;337(8752):1235-43. PMID: 1674060.
  16. Aboyans V., Lacroix P., Guilloux J., Rollé F., Le Guyader A., Cautrès M., Cornu E., Laskar M. Predictive model for screening cerebrovascular disease in patient undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4(2):90-5. PMID: 17670364. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2004.092262
  17. Безденежных А.В., Сумин А.Н., Иванов С.В., Барбараш О.Л. Предикторы госпитальных осложнений коронарного шунтирования: роль мультифокального атеросклероза. Сибирский медицинский журнал. 2016;31(1):35-41. Режим доступа: http://www.cardio-tomsk.ru/attachments/article/706/SMJ-2016-1_Light.pdf [Bezdenezhnikh A.V., Sumin A.N., Ivanov S.V., Barbarsh O.L. Predictors of hospital complications of coronary bypass: the role of multifocal atherosclerosis. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Siberian Medical Journal. 2016;31(1):35-41. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.cardio-tomsk.ru/attachments/article/706/SMJ-2016-1_Light.pdf]
  18. Mozes G., Sullivan T.M., Torres-Russotto D.R., Bower T.C., Hoskin T.L., Sampaio S.M., Gloviczki P., Panneton J.M., Noel A.A., Cherry K.J. Jr. Carotid endarterectomy in SAPPHIRE-eligible high-risk patients: implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(5):958-65; discussion 965-6. PMID: 15111844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.037
  19. Казанцев А.Н. Факторы неблагоприятного прогноза различных хирургических стратегий лечения пациентов с сочетанным поражением коронарного русла и сонных артерий в 30-дневном послеоперационном периоде. Кузбасс: образование, наука, инновации. Материалы инновационного конвента. 9 декабря 2016 г.; Кемерово, Россия. Кемерово; Новокузнецк: Изд. центр СибГИУ; 2016. с. 332-335. Режим доступа: http://www.sibsiu.ru/downloads/public/inn-conv/2016.pdf [Kazantsev A.N. Factors of unfavorable prognosis of various surgical strategies for treating patients with combined coronary and carotid lesions in a 30-day postoperative period. Kuzbass: obrazovanie, nauka, innovatsii. Materialy innovatsionnogo konventa = Kuzbass: education, science, innovation. Materials Innovation Convent. 2016 December; Kemerovo, Russia. Kemerovo; Novokuznetsk: Izd. tsentr SibSIU Publ.; 2016. p. 332-335. (In Russ.) Available from: http://www.sibsiu.ru/downloads/public/inn-conv/2016.pdf]
  20. Тарасов Р.С., Иванов С.В., Казанцев А.Н., Бурков Н.Н., Ануфриев А.И., Зинец М.Г., Барбараш Л.С. Госпитальные результаты различных стратегий хирургического лечения пациентов с сочетанным поражением коронарного русла и внутренних сонных артерий. Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2016;(4):15-24. https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-4-15-24 [Tarasov R.S., Ivanov S.V., Kazantsev A.N., Burkov N.N., Anufriev A.I., Zinets M.G., Barbarash L.S. Hospital results of the different strategies of surgical treatment of patients with concomitant coronary disease and internal carotid arteries stenoses. Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniy = Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016;(4):15-24. https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-4-15-24]