Vol. 20 No. 1 (2016)
CASE REPORTS

Modern high-tech methods of re-intervention in serious patients: a clinical report

PDF (Русский)
  • Yu. Odarenko,
  • D. Shukevich,
  • N. Rutkovskaya,
  • A. Stasev,
  • N. Kondyukova,
  • O. Kuzmina,
  • L. Barbarash
Yu. Odarenko
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
D. Shukevich
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
N. Rutkovskaya
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
A. Stasev
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
N. Kondyukova
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
O. Kuzmina
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
L. Barbarash
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 6 Sosnoviy Blvd., 650002 Kemerovo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2016-1-62-67

Published 2016-03-25

Keywords

  • prosthesis dysfunction,
  • re-intervention,
  • complications,
  • follow-up,
  • multi-organ dysfunction syndrome,
  • extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Odarenko, Y., Shukevich, D., Rutkovskaya, N., Stasev, A., Kondyukova, N., Kuzmina, O., & Barbarash, L. (2016). Modern high-tech methods of re-intervention in serious patients: a clinical report. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 20(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2016-1-62-67

Copyright (c) 2016 Odarenko Yu. N., Shukevich D. L., Rutkovskaya N. V., Stasev A. N., Kondyukova N. V., Kuzmina O. K., Barbarash L. S.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

A clinical report on surgical treatment of an elderly patient with a dysfunction of the bioprosthesis in the mitral position is presented. Considered in the report are methods of management and treatment of the patient at the stages of preparation for surgery, anesthetic management, re-intervention and early postoperative period. Using the proposed techniques for surgical and intensive care allowed to prevent the development of persistent organ failure and to provide a satisfactory and stable outcome of re-intervention during long-term follow-up.

PDF (Русский)

References

  1. Kaneko T, Aranki S, Javed Q, McGurk S, Shekar P, Davidson M, Cohn L. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):117-26. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.028.
  2. Tillquist MN, Maddox TM. Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:91-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S16420.
  3. Bokeria LA, Gudkova RG. Bolezni i vrozhdennye anomalii sistemy krovoobrashhenija. Moscow, 2014. 220 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Weerasinghe A, Edwards MB, Taylor KM. First redo heart valve replacement: a 10-year analysis. Circulation. 1999;99(5):655-8.
  5. Potter DD, Sundt TM 3rd, Zehr KJ, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Mullany CJ, McGregor CG, Puga FJ, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA. Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(1):67-72.
  6. Borger MA, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Peniston CM, Mickleborough LL, Rambaldini G, Cohen G, Rao V, Feindel CM, David TE. Decreasing incidence of stroke during valvular surgery. Circulation. 1998;98(19 Suppl):II137-43.
  7. Wauthy P, Goldstein JP, Demanet H, Deuvaert FE. Redo valve surgery nowadays: what have we learned? Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103(5):475-80.
  8. Onorati F, Biancari F, De Feo M, Mariscalco G, Messina A, Santarpino G, Santini F, Beghi C, Nappi G, Troise G, Fischlein T, Passerone G, Heikkinen J, Faggian G. Mid-term results of aortic valve surgery in redo scenarios in the current practice: results from the multicentre European RECORD (REdo Cardiac Operation Research Database) initiative. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(2):269-80. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu116.
  9. Vohra HA, Whistance RN, Roubelakis A, Burton A, Barlow CW, Tsang GM, Livesey SA, Ohri SK. Outcome after redo-mitral valve replacement in adult patients: a 10-year single-centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(5):575-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs005.
  10. Azadani A, Tseng E. Transcatheter Heart Valves for Failing Bioprostheses State-of-the-Art Review of Valve-in-Valve Implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(6):621-628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.964478.
  11. Milburn K, Bapat V, Thomas M. Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103(6):417-29. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0653-3.
  12. Cove ME, MacLaren G. Clinical review: mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):235. doi: 10.1186/cc9229.
  13. Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O, Kuhn E, Deppe AC, Scherner M, Madershahian N, Choi YH, Wahlers T. Outcomes after peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience. J Surg Res. 2013;181(2):e47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.07.030.
  14. Loforte A, Pilato E, Martin Suarez S, Folesani G, Jafrancesco G, Castrovinci S, Cefarelli M, Potena L, Magnani G, Grigioni F, Caramelli F, Frascaroli G, Di Bartolomeo R, Marinelli G. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock in adults: strategies, results, and predictors of mortality. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2014;15(10):577-85. doi: 10.1714/1672.18312.
  15. Barbarash LS, Grigoryev EV, Plotnikov GP, Shukevich DL, Shukevich LE. Hemodynamics and hydrodynamic status during renal replacement therapy in systemic inflammatory response syndrome of infectious or noninfectious etiology. Кompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevanii [Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases]. 2012;(2):39-44. doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2012-2-39-44. (In Russ.).
  16. Plotnikov GP, Malakhov YV, Hayes BL, Grigoryev YV, Barbarash LS. Respiratory-Kinesiological Rehabilitation in the Early Periods after Cardiosurgical Interventions. Obshchaya reanimatologiya [General Reanimatology]. 2009;5(6):71. doi: 10.15360/1813-9779-2009-6-71. (In Russ.).
  17. Unosawa S, Sezai A, Hata M, Nakata K, Yoshitake I, Wakui S, Kimura H, Takahashi K, Hata H, Shiono M. Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Surg Today. 2013;43(3):264-70. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0322-6M.
  18. Gaffney AM, Wildhirt SM, Griffin MJ, Annich GM, Radomski MW. Extracorporeal life support. BMJ. 2010;341:c5317. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5317.
  19. Hetzel GR, Schmitz M, Wissing H, Ries W, Schott G, Heering PJ, Isgro F, Kribben A, Himmele R, Grabensee B, Rump LC. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin for anticoagulation in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(1):232-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq575.
  20. Barbarash LS, Kokorin SG, Plotnikov GP, Shukevich, DL, Grigoriev EV. Postoperative complications after redo valve surgery. Sibirskij Medicinskij Zurnal [The Siberian Medical Journal]. 2013;28(4):50-54. (In Russ.).
  21. Jörres A. Evidence-based renal replacement therapy--intermittent versus CRRT. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2013;48(2):108-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1336587.