CSPG4/NG2 transcriptional activity as a prognostic marker of the postoperative clinical course of glioblastoma
Published 2015-10-27
Keywords
- glioblastoma,
- CSPG4/NG2 gene,
- chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan,
- prognosis
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2015 Tsidulko A.Yu., Kobozev V.V., Volkov A.M., Kostromskaya D.V., Aidagulova S.V., Kiseliov R.S., Prudnikova T.Yu., Krivoshapkin A.L.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Objective. Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumor characterized by severe invasive growth and poor prognosis. The expression of different genes is changed in tumors, including gene CSPG4/NG2, which plays a significant role in the proliferation of glioblastoma cells and tumor neovascularization. The objective of our study was to evaluate the possibility of using the above gene as a prognostic marker for glioblastoma.
Methods. 8 patients with a diagnosis "glioblastoma" underwent clinical and molecular-biological examination. The tumor samples were fixed in RNA-later (LifeTechnologies, USA). CSPG4/NG2 and CD44 expression was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR with GAPDH as a reference gene. The patients were divided into two groups according to the postoperative survival rate: Group 1 – less than 1 year, and Group 2 – over 1 year after surgery.
Results. Molecular biological studies showed a significant 4-fold increase of CSPG4/NG2 expression level in tumors from group 1 as compared to that of group 2 patients. It was also found out that increased CSPG4/NG2 expression in galloping tumors is in positive correlation with an increase in cancer stem-cell marker CD44 expression (Pearson coefficient 0.9514).
Conclusion. The data obtained suggest that CSPG4/NG2 is a promising prognostic marker to determine optimal postoperative treatment of patients with glioblastoma.
References
- Гайтан А.С., Кривошапкин А.Л., Каныгин В.В. Результаты резекции глиобластом головного мозга с применением комбинированной флуоресцентной навигации // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2014. Т. 2. С. 37–41.
- Chekenya M., Krakstad C., Svendsen A. et al. // Oncogene. 2008. Vol. 27. № 39. P. 5182–5194.
- Hsu N.C., Nien P.Y., Yokoyama K.K. et al. // Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013. Vol. 441. № 2. P. 514–518.
- Karsy M., Neil J.A., Guan J. et al. // Neurosurg. Focus. 2015. Vol. 38. № 3. P. E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14755.
- Petrovici K., Graf M., Hecht K. et al. // Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2010. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 173–180.
- Pointer K.B., Clark P.A., Zorniak M. et al. // Neurochem. Int. 2014. Vol. 71. P. 1–7.
- Price M.A., Colvin Wanshura L.E., Yang J. et al. // Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011. Vol. 24. № 6. P. 1148–1157.
- Stallcup W.B., Huang F-J. // Cell Adh. Migr. 2008. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 192–201.
- Svendsen A., Verhoeff J.J., Immervoll H. et al. // Acta Neuropathol. 2011. Vol. 122. № 4. P. 495–510.
- Wang J., Svendsen A., Kmiecik J. et al. // PLoS One. 2011. Vol. 6. № 7. P. e23062. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023062