Vol. 19 No. 3 (2015)
HEART RHYTHM DISORDERS

Long-term ECG monitoring using an implantable loop recorder for the detection of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter

PDF (Русский)
  • S. Bayramova,
  • A. Romanov,
  • S. Mittal,
  • D. Musat,
  • J. S. Steinberg,
  • Ye. Pokushalov
S. Bayramova
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Romanov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
S. Mittal
Arrhythmia Institute, Valley Health System, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
Bio
D. Musat
Arrhythmia Institute, Valley Health System, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
Bio
J. S. Steinberg
Arrhythmia Institute, Valley Health System, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
Bio
Ye. Pokushalov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-100-109

Published 2015-10-27

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation,
  • atrial flutter,
  • catheter ablation,
  • cavotricuspid isthmus,
  • implantable loop recorder

How to Cite

Bayramova, S., Romanov, A., Mittal, S., Musat, D., Steinberg, J. S., & Pokushalov, Y. (2015). Long-term ECG monitoring using an implantable loop recorder for the detection of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 19(3), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-100-109

Copyright (c) 2015 Bayramova S.A., Romanov A.B., Mittal S., Musat D., Steinberg J.S., Pokushalov Ye.A.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objective. In patients with atrial flutter who undergo cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, long-term electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring may identify a new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of our study was to ascertain, through the use of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) with a dedicated AF detection algorithm, the incidence, duration, and burden of new AF in these patients and to develop an optimal post-ablation ECG monitoring strategy.
Methods. We enrolled 20 patients with flutter, a CHADS2 score of 2–3, and no prior episode of AF. After cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, we implanted an ILR, which was interrogated routinely in order to evaluate and analyze all stored ECG data.
Results. During a mean follow-up of 382±218 days, 3 patterns were observed. First, in 11 (55%) patients stored ECGs confirmed AF at 62±38 days after ablation. Second, in 4 (20%) patients, although the ILR suggested AF, the episodes actually represented sinus rhythm with frequent premature atrial contractions and/or over-sensing. Third, in 5 (25%) patients, no AF was observed. The episodes less than 4 hours were associated with low AF burden (<1%) or false detections. The 1-year freedom from any episode of AF less than 4 and 12 hours was 52% and 83%, respectively.
Conclusion. Our data show that many (but not all) patients develop new AF within the first 4 months of flutter ablation. Since external ECG monitoring for this duration is impractical, the ILR has an important role for long-term AF surveillance. Future research should be directed toward identifying the relationship between the duration/burden of AF and stroke and improving the existing ILR technology.

PDF (Русский)

References

  1. Fuster V., Ryden L.E., Cannom D.S., et al. 2011ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines // Circulation. 2011. Vol. 123. P. 269–367.
  2. Gage B.F., Waterman A.D., Shannon W., Boechler M., Rich M.W., Radford M.J. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation // JAMA. 2001. Vol. 285. P. 2864–2890.
  3. Glotzer T.V., Daoud E.G., Wyse D.G., et al. The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study // Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2009. Vol. 2. P. 474–480.
  4. Healey J.S., Connolly S.J., Gold M.R., et al. for the ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 366. P. 120–129.
  5. Mittal S, Movsovitz C, Steinberg J S. Ambulatory external electrocardiographic monitoring: focus on atrial fibrillation // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011. Vol. 58. P. 1741–1749.
  6. Hindricks G., Pokushalov E., Urban L., et al. on behalf of the XPECT Trial Investigators. Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitorin detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation: results of the XPECT trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3: 141–147.
  7. Babaev A., Suma V., Tita C., Steinberg J.S. Recurrence rate of atrial flutter after initial presentation in patients on drug treatment // Am. J. Cardiol. 2003. Vol. 92. P. 1122–1124.
  8. Natale A., Newby K.H., Pisano E., et al. Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000. Vol. 35. P. 1898–1904.
  9. Ellis K., Wazni O., Marrouche N., et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation post-cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter: left-atrialsize as an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2007. Vol. 18. P. 799–802.
  10. Luria D.M., Hodge D.O., Monahan K.H., et al. Effect of radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter on the natural history of subsequent atrial arrhythmias // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2008. Vol. 19. P. 1145–1150.
  11. Perez F.J., Schubert C.M., Parvez B., Pathak V., Ellenbogen K.A., Wood M.A. Long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter: a meta-analysis // Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2009. Vol. 2. P. 393–401.
  12. Biblo L.A., Yuan Z., Quan K.J., Mackell J.A., Rimm A.A. Risk of stroke in patients with atrial flutter // Am. J. Cardiol. 2001. Vol. 87. P. 346–349.
  13. Navarrette A., Conte F., Moran M., Ali I., Milikan N. Ablation of atrial fibrillation at the time of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter without documented atrial fibrillation derives a better long-term benefit // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2011. Vol. 22. P. 34–38.
  14. Eitel C., Husser D., Hindricks G., et al. Performance of an implantable automatic atrial fibrillation detection device: impact of software adjustments and relevance of manual episode analysis // Europace. 2011. Vol. 12. P. 480–485.
  15. Botto G.L., Padeletti L., Santini M., et al. Presence and duration of atrial fibrillation detected by continuous monitoring: crucial implications for the risk of thromboembolic events // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2009. Vol. 20. P. 241–248.
  16. Kapa S., Epstein A.E., Callans D.J., et al. Assessing arrhythmia burden using an implantable loop recorder: the ABACUS study // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2013. Vol. 24. P. 875–881.
  17. Paruchuri V., Adhaduk M., Garikipati N.V., Steinberg J.S., Mittal S. Clinical utility of a novel wireless implantable loop recorder in the evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope // Heart Rhythm. 2011. Vol. 8. P. 858–863.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.