Vol. 19 No. 3 (2015)
VASCULAR SURGERY

Endovascular treatment of steno-occlusive lesions of subclavian arteries disease

PDF (Русский)
  • A. Karpenko,
  • P. Ignatenko,
  • V. Starodubtsev,
  • A. Gostev
A. Karpenko
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
P. Ignatenko
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
V. Starodubtsev
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Gostev
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-87-93

Published 2015-10-27

Keywords

  • occlusion subclavian artery,
  • vertebrobasilar insufficiency,
  • steal syndrome

How to Cite

Karpenko, A., Ignatenko, P., Starodubtsev, V., & Gostev, A. (2015). Endovascular treatment of steno-occlusive lesions of subclavian arteries disease. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 19(3), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-87-93

Copyright (c) 2015 Karpenko A.A., Ignatenko P.V., Starodubtsev V.B., Gostev A.A.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of our study is to access the safety and efficacy of endovascular interventions for treatment of steno-occlusive disease of the subclavian artery.
Methods. 205 patients with a steno-occlusive disease of the subclavian artery (SA) were included in this single-center retrospective study. 126 (61%) patients with stenosis of SA formed the 1st group, while 79 (39%) patients with SA occlusion made up the 2nd group. The treatment process was monitored intraoperatively by means of angiography, serial color Doppler ultrasonography of brachiocephalic vessels and complete neurological evaluation prior to discharge. The patients were then followed up over a period from 6 months to 5 years.
Results. During the perioperative period one stroke (0.8%) in the vertebrobasilar basin was registered in the 1st group. In the 2nd group one transient ischemic attack (1.2%) was observed. Re-interventions in the long-term period were carried out in 4 (3.1%) cases in the 1st group and 4 (5%) cases in the 2nd group (р = 0.419). The cumulative primary stent patency at 3 years was 96.7% in the 1st group and 94.1% in the 2nd group (р = 0.492).
Conclusion. In the case of occlusion of the subclavian artery it could be appropriate to perform endovascular recanalization followed by stenting as the first stage of surgery. Endovascular treatment of lesions is an effective and safe method of prevention of stroke in the vertebrobasilar basin.

PDF (Русский)

References

  1. Gulli G., Marquardt L., Rothwell P.M., Markus H.S. Stroke risk after posterior circulation stroke/transient ischemic attack and its relationship to site of vertebrobasilar stenosis pooled data analysis from prospective studies. Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44. № 3. P. 598–604.
  2. Labropoulos N., Nandivada P., Bekelis K. Stroke of the posterior cerebral circulation // Int. Angiol. 2011. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 105–14.
  3. Tan T.Y., Schminke U., Lien L.M., Tegeler C.H. Subclavian steal syndrome: can the blood pressure difference between arms predict the severity of steal? // J. Neuroimaging, 2002. Vol. 12. P. 131–35.
  4. Hennerici M., Klemm C., Rautenberg W: The subclavian steal phenomenon: a common vascular disorder with rare neurologic deficits // Neurology, 1988. Vol. 38. P. 669–73.
  5. Fields W.S., Lemak N.A. Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. VII. Subclavian steals – a review of 168 cases // JAMA, 1972. Vol. 222. P. 1139–43.
  6. Labropoulos N., Nandivada P., Bekelis K. Prevalence and Impact of the Subclavian Steal Syndrome // Ann. Surg. 2010. Vol. 252. P. 166–70.
  7. Nicholls S.C., Koutlas T.C., Strandness D.E. Clinical significance of retrograde flow in the vertebral artery // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 1991. Vol. 5. P. 331–36.
  8. Heidrich H., Bayer O. Symptomatology of the subclavian steal syndrome // Angiology. 1969. Vol. 20. P. 406–13.
  9. Herring M. The subclavian steal syndrome: a review // Am. Surg. 1977. Vol. 43. P. 220–28.
  10. Grossman B.L., Brisman R., Wood E.H. Ultrasound and the subclavian steal syndrome. Radiology. 1970. Vоl. 94: P. 1–6.
  11. Drutman J., Gyorke A., Davis W.L., Turski P.A. Evaluations of subclavian steal with two-dimensional phase-contrast and two-dimensional time- of-flight MR angiography // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1994. Vol. 15. P. 1642–45.
  12. Olsen K., Lund C. Subclavian steal syndrome. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen // 2006. Vol. 126. P. 3259–62.
  13. De Vries J.P., Jager L.C., van den Berg J.C. Durability of Percutaneous trans- luminal angioplasty for obstructive lesions of proximal subclavian artery: long term results // Vasca. J. Surg. 2005. Vol. 41. P. 19–23.
  14. Bates M.C., Broc M., Lavigne P.S., Stone P. Subclavian artery stenting: factors influencing long-term outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc. Intervet, 2004. Vol. 61. P. 5–11.
  15. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с сосудистой артериальной патологией. Часть 3. Брахиоцефальные артерии. М., 2012. С. 35–39.
  16. Dattilo J.B, Cambria R.P. Complications of repair of the supra – aortic trunks and the vertebral arteries.: in Towne J.B., Hollier L.H. (eds) Complications in vascular surgery. New York, Marcel Dekken, 2005. P. 457–466.
  17. Palchik E., Bakken A.M., Wolford H.Y. et al: Subclavian artery revascularization: an outcome analysis based on mode of therapy and presenting symptoms // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 22. P. 70–78.
  18. Wang K.Q., Wang Z.G., Yang B.Z. et al. Long-term results of endovascular therapy for proximal subclavian arterial obstructive lesions // Chin. Med. J. (Engl), 2010. Vol. 123. № 1. P. 45–50.
  19. Galkin P.V., Antonov G.I., Mitroshin G.E. et al. Surgical correction of cerebral blood flow steal syndrome by aortic branches stenosis // Khirurgiia (Mosk), 2009. Vol. 7. P. 15–21.
  20. Bogey W.M., Demasi R.J., Tripp M.D., Vithalani R., Johnsrude I.S., Powell S.C. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for subclavian artery stenosis // Am. Surg. 1994. Vol. 60. P. 103–106.
  21. Duber C., Klose K.J., Kopp H., Schmiedt W. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for occlusion of subclavian artery: short- and long-term results // Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1992. Vol. 15. P. 205–210.
  22. Farina C., Mingoli A., Schultz R.D., Castrucci M., Feldhaus R.J., Rossi P., Cavallaro A. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus surgery for subclavian artery occlusive disease // Am. J. Surg. 1989. Vol. 158. P. 511–514.
  23. Hebrang A., Maskovic J., Tomac B. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the subclavian arteries: long-term results in 52 patients // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1991. Vol. 156. P. 1091–1094.
  24. Kachel R., Basche S., Heerklotz I., Grossman K., Endler S. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of supra-aortic arteries especially the internal carotid artery // Neuroradiology. 1991. Vol. 33. P. 191–194.
  25. Mathias K.D., Luth I., Haarmann P. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of proximal subclavian artery occlusions // Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1993. Vol. 16. P. 214–218.
  26. Motarjeme A. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of supra-aortic vessels // J. Endovasc. Surg. 1996. Vol. 3. P. 171–181.
  27. Linni K., Ugurluoglu A., Mader N. et al. Endovascular management ver- sus surgery for proximal subclavian artery lesions // Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2008. Vol. 22. № 6. P. 769–67.
  28. Markus H.S., van der Worp H.B., Rothwell P.M. Posterior circulation ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack: diagnosis, investigation, and secondary prevention // Lancet Neurol. 2013. Vol. 12. № 10. P. 989–98.
  29. Карпенко А.А., Кужугет Р.А., Стародубцев В.Б., Игнатенко П.В., Ким И.Н., Горбатых В.Н. Непосредственные и отдаленные результаты различных методов реконструкции каротидной бифуркации // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2013. № 1. С. 21–24.
  30. Jung K.-H., Kim J.-M., Lee S.-T. et al. Brain Response Characteristics Associated with Subclavian Steal Phenomenon // Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2014. Vol. 23. P. 157–161.