Vol. 19 No. 3 (2015)
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASES

Prospective registry of percutaneous coronary interventions: Tyumen Cardiology Center’s experience

V. Kuznetsov
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
I. Bessonov
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
G. Pushkarev
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
N. Musikhina
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
E. Gultyaeva
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
I. Zyrianov
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
Ye. Gorbatenko
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio
S. Sapozhnikov
Tyumen Cardiology Center, Branch of Research Institute of Cardiology, 111 Melnikaite St., Tyumen 625026, Russian Federation
Bio

Published 2015-10-22

Keywords

  • percutaneous coronary intervention,
  • register

How to Cite

Kuznetsov, V., Bessonov, I., Pushkarev, G., Musikhina, N., Gultyaeva, E., Zyrianov, I., Gorbatenko, Y., & Sapozhnikov, S. (2015). Prospective registry of percutaneous coronary interventions: Tyumen Cardiology Center’s experience. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 19(3), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-80-86

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and to identify the factors impacting long-term prognosis.
Methods. The register included 1018 patients who underwent PCI at Tyumen Cardiology Center from October 2012 to November 2013.
Results. Hospital cardiovascular mortality rate was 0.8%, while that at 1-year follow-up amounted to 2%. Mortality was associated with age (OR = 1.005; 95% CI 1.003-1.103; p = 0.037), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.86-0.96; p = 0.001), left anterior descending artery lesions (OR = 4.73; 95% CI 1.06-21.04; p = 0.042), success of PCI (OR = 0.07; 95% CI 0.02-0.35; p = 0.001), hypodynamia (OR = 5.99; 95% CI 1.78-20.2; p = 0.004) and a low level of social support (OR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.20-0 82; p = 0.012). Main adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE) were associated with the history of coronary artery bypass grafting (OR = 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.62; p = 0.016), PCI (OR = 1.66; 95 % CI 1.06-2.62; p = 0.028), SYNTAX score (OR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.09; p <0.001), success of PCI (OR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.82; p = 0.017).
Conclusion. PCI is a safe and effective procedure for treatment of coronary heart disease, which results in low MACCE and mortality rates.

References

  1. Бойцов С.А., Марцевич С.Ю., Кутишенко Н.П. и др. // Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2013. Т. 12. № 1. С. 4–9.
  2. Tang E.W., Wong C.K., Herbison P. // American Heart Journal. 2007. Vol. 153. № 1. P. 29–35.
  3. Бокерия Л.А., Алекян Б.Г. Рентгенэндоваскулярная диагностика и лечение заболеваний сердца и сосудов в Российской Федерации. М., 2014. 206 с.
  4. Hannan E.L., Samadashvili Z., Cozzens K. et al. // Circulation. 2012. Vol. 125. № 15. P. 1870–1879.
  5. Wijeysundera H.C., Bennell M.C., Qiu F. et al. // Journal of general internal medicine. 2014. Vol. 8. P. 1–9.
  6. Pursnani S., Korley F., Gopaul R. et al. // Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012. Vol. 5. № 4. P. 476–490.
  7. Кузнецов В.А., Зырянов И.П., Гультяева Е.П., и др. // Дальневосточный медицинский журнал. 2012. № 2. С. 33–36.
  8. Kuznetsov V.A., Gultyaeva E.P., Berdinskih S.G. et al. // European Heart Journal. 2010. Vol. 31. P. 362.
  9. Kirtane A.J., Gupta A., Iyengar S. et al. // Circulation. 2009. Vol. 119. № 25. P. 3198–3206.
  10. Reiner, M., Niermann, C., Jekauc, D. et al. // BMC Public Health. 2013. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 813.
  11. Perk J., De Backer G., Gohlke H. et al. // European Heart Journal. 2012. Vol. 33. № 13. P. 1635–1701.
  12. Kolh P., Windecker S., Alfonso F. et al. // European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2014. Vol. 46. № 4. P. 517–592.
  13. Mohr F.W., Morice M.C., Kappetein A.P. et al. // The lancet. 2013. Vol. 381. № 9867. P. 629–638.
  14. Бессонов И.С., Зырянов И.П., Кузнецов В.А. и др. // Международный журнал интервенционной кардиоангиологии. 2013. № 33. C. 8–15.
  15. He J.Q., Gao Y.C., Yu X.P. et al. // Chinese medical journal. 2011. Vol. 124. № 5. P. 704–709.