Vol. 19 No. 3 (2015)
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASES

Dynamics of myocardial perfusion in scar tissue according to stress CMR in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing endovascular recanalization of CTO of right coronary artery

PDF (Русский)
  • V. Kurbatov,
  • A. Obedinskiy,
  • N. Obedinskaya,
  • D. Ponomarev,
  • Ye. Pokushalov
V. Kurbatov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Obedinskiy
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
N. Obedinskaya
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
D. Ponomarev
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
Ye. Pokushalov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation, 15 Rechkunovskaya St., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-74-79

Published 2015-10-22

Keywords

  • postinfarction cardiosclerosis,
  • stress CMR,
  • СТO of right coronary artery,
  • PCI

How to Cite

Kurbatov, V., Obedinskiy, A., Obedinskaya, N., Ponomarev, D., & Pokushalov, Y. (2015). Dynamics of myocardial perfusion in scar tissue according to stress CMR in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing endovascular recanalization of CTO of right coronary artery. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 19(3), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-3-74-79

Copyright (c) 2015 Kurbatov V.P., Obedinskiy A.A., Obedinskaya N.R., Ponomarev D.N., Pokushalov Ye.A.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perfusion of scar tissue in the concerned basin blood supply before and after PCI in the presence of CTO RCA by using CMRI with delayed contrast enhancement and pharmacological stress test.
Methods. The results of prospective randomized study involving two groups of patients with the presence of СТO coronary arteries and PIC (scar) are presented. The first group was with successful PCI, the second group received only conservative therapy. Delayed contrast-enhanced CMRI with a stress test was performed in all patients at baseline and after 2 months.
Results. Group 1 had a significantly reduced mean number of segments with the presence of stress perfusion defects in the scar tissue during the control cardiac MRI, from 2.84 (1.64) to 2.00 (1.61), the mean difference was –0.84, 95% CI for the difference –1.23... –0.46, р<0.01. The mean (SD) number of segments with perfusion defects remained unchanged in group 2 and amounted to 2.36 (1.61).
Conclusion. According to our data, endovascular recanalization of СТO coronary arteries in patients with PIC improves perfusion in the scar area.

PDF (Русский)

References

  1. De Wood M.A., Spores J., Notske R. et al. // N. Engl. J. Med. 1980. Vol. 303. P. 897–902.
  2. Olivari Z., Rubartelli P., Piscione F. et al. // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003. Vol 41. P. 1672–1678.
  3. Осиев А.Г., Кретов Е.И., Найденов Р.А. и др. // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия 2013. № 3. С. 46–49.
  4. Kim R.J., Fieno D.S., Parrish T.B. et al. // Circulation. 1999. Vol. 100. P. 1992–2002.
  5. Greenwood J.P., Maredia N., Younger J.F. et al. // Lancet. 2012. Vol. 379. P. 453–456.
  6. Nandalur K.R., Dwamena B.A., Choudhri A.F. et al. // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 50. P. 1343–1353.
  7. Курбатов В.П., Гензель Н.Р., Обединский А.А. и др. // Радиология практика. 2012. № 4. С. 27–34.
  8. Montalescot G., Sechtem U., AchenbachS. et al. // Eur. Heart J. 2013. Vol. 34. P. 2949–3003.
  9. Davies R.F., Goldberg A.D., Forman S. et al. // Circulation. 1997. V. 95. P. 2037–2043.
  10. Sun Y., Weber K.T. // J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 1996. Vol. 28. P. 851–858.
  11. Vracko R., Thorning D. // LabInvest. 1991. Vol. 65. P. 214–227.
  12. De Mey J.G.R., Fazzi G.E. // Hypertension. 1996. Vol. 28. P. 696.
  13. Gabbiani G., Hirschel B.J., Ryan G.B., et al. // J. Exp. Med. Vol. 67. P. 719–734.
  14. Camici P.G., Prasad S.K., Rimoldi O.E. et al. // Circulation. 2008. Vol. 117. P. 103–114.
  15. Ross J.Jr. // Circulation. 1991. Vol. 83. P. 1076–1083.
  16. lhaddad I.A., Kloner R.A., Hakim I. et al. // Am. Heart. J. 1996. Vol. 131. № 3. P. 451–457.