Vol. 19 No. 2 (2015)
VASCULAR SURGERY

Comparative evaluation of the results of surgical and endovascular methods of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with low and medium risk factors

E. Charchyan
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
Bio
C. Abugov
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Stepanenko
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
A. Gens
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
M. Puretsky
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
R. Polyakov
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
A. Karapetyan
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation
Bio
A. Skvortsov
Academician B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy Per., Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation

Published 2015-10-08

Keywords

  • surgical treatment,
  • endovascular repair,
  • infrarenal aneurysms

How to Cite

Charchyan, E., Abugov, C., Stepanenko, A., Gens, A., Puretsky, M., Polyakov, R., Karapetyan, A., & Skvortsov, A. (2015). Comparative evaluation of the results of surgical and endovascular methods of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with low and medium risk factors. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 19(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2015-2-77-83

Abstract

Background. According to the data by various authors the incidence of abdominal aorta aneurysms varies from 8 to 12%, with the mortality rate reaching 7.2-9,0%. At present, two alternative methods of repair exist: surgical and endovascular procedures.
Methods. The study involved 98 patients with athero-sclerotic aneurysms of an infrarenal part of the abdominal aorta with unexpressed concomitant pathology (without signs of ischemic heart disease, a light degree of chronic obstructive lung disease, etc.). The first group of 38 patients underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aorta aneurysms. The second group involved 60 patients who underwent open resection of the aneurysm followed by conventional implantation of a linear or bifurcational prosthesis.
Results. In the endovascular repair group significantly better intraoperative and early postoperative indicators were observed (absence of marked pain syndrome, shorter hospital stay). However, in the late postoperative period complications were recorded: endoleak n=4 (10.8%), graft thrombosis in the region of iliac arteries n=2 (5.3%), decrease of sexual potency because of the involvement of internal iliac arteries n=3 (7.9%). Some complications required complex repetitive surgical interventions. No complications directly related to aortic repair were observed in those patients who underwent surgical treatment during 5-year follow-up.
Conclusions. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a highly effective and less traumatic method of treatment. However, in patients with low and medium risk factors surgical treatment should be considered as a priority.

Received 25 December 2014. Accepted 12 March 2015. 

References

  1. Johnson K.W. Morbidity and mortality associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results from the Canadian aneurysm study // Current critical problem in Vascular Surgery. 1990. № 2. P. 248–255.
  2. Strachan D.P. Predictors of death from aortic aneurysm among middle–aged men: the Whitehall study // Br. J Surg. 1991. P. 401–404.
  3. Дудкин Б.П., Бубкевич А.Ц., Воронцов В. В., и др. Оправдны ли ондномоментные комбинированные и сочетанные операции у больных с аневризмой брюшного отдела аорты // Материалы XIII Международной конференции Российского общества ангиологов и сосудистых хирургов. М., 2005. С. 114–115.
  4. Покровский А.В., Дан В.Н., Златовчен А.М., Ильин С.А. Влияние кардиального статуса и артериальной гипертензии на результаты лечения больных с аневризмами брюшной аорты старше 70 лет // Ангилогия и сосудистая хирургия. 2003. Т. 9 № 1. С. 71–75.
  5. Cheng S.W.K. Endovascular stent grafts: a new standart of treatment for aortic diseases // Medical Progress (Hong Kong Edition). 2005. Vol. 3. P. 115–120.
  6. Rutherford R.B., Krupski W.C., Current status of open, versus endovascular stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm // J. Vasc. Surg. 2004. Vol. 39. № 5. P. 1129–1139.
  7. Cronenwett J.L. Endovascular aneurysm repair: important mid-term results // Lancet. 2005. Vol. 365. № 9478. P. 2156–8.
  8. White G.H., Yu W., May J. et. al. Endoleak as a complication of endolu-minal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management // J. Endovasc. Surg. 1997. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 152–168.
  9. Mehta M., Sternbach Y., Taggert J.B., Kreienberg P.B., Roddy S.P., Paty P.S., Ozsvath K.J. J. // Vasc. Surg. 2010. № 52 (6). P. 1442.
  10. Becquemin J.P., Pillet J.C., Lescalie F., Sapoval M., Goueffic Y., Lermusiaux P., Steinmetz E., Marzelle J. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low-to moderate-risk patients // J. Vasc. Surg. 2011. Vol. 53. № 5. P. 1167–1173.e1.
  11. Rutherford R.B., Schermerhorn M.L., Cronenwett J.L. Abdominal Aortic and lliac Aneurysms // Vascular. Surgery. 2005 (6-th edition). P. 1420–1423.