Vol. 16 No. 4 (2012)
ANGIONEUROLOGY & NEUROSURGERY

The long-term experience of the ischemic stroke surgical prevention

A. Chernyavskiy
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio
T. Vinogradova
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Bio

Published 2012-11-30

Keywords

  • SURGICAL PREVENTION OF STROKE,
  • CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY,
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY

How to Cite

Chernyavskiy, A., & Vinogradova, T. (2012). The long-term experience of the ischemic stroke surgical prevention. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 16(4), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2012-4-21-26

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality from stroke in the world is high and the problem of stroke prevention is still rather acute. The article presents a review of ischemic stroke surgical prevention results that were received during 12 years in Novosibirsk state research institute of blood circulation pathology. The concept of surgical and of ischemic stroke medical prevention is presented, based on the knowledge gained from epidemiological studies conducted in open populations of cities in Siberia and the Far East. We proposed algorithms and standards (guidelines) of examination and treatment of these patients after analysis of performed studies. Program of ischemic stroke surgical prevention was developed to optimize organizational and preventive measures. Results of epidemiological and clinical studies have been widely reported in the leading journals and have been presented in a number of dissertations. Guidelines and recommendations of these studies are used in physicians practice in our institute.

References

  1. Hacke W., Kaste M., Wechsler L. et al. // Lancet. 1998. № 352. P. 1245-1251.
  2. Ответный удар по глобальной эпидемии. Интервью с вице-президентом Национальной ассоциации по борьбе с инсультом, директором НИИ инсульта РГМУ, чл.-кор. РАМН В. Скворцовой // Медицинская газета. № 62. 24 августа 2012. http: // www.mgzt. ru/article/360.
  3. Adams H.P., Adams R.J. et al. // Stroke. 2003. V. 34 (4). P. 1056-1083.
  4. Kaste M., Olsen T.S. et al. // Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000. V. 10. P. 1-11.
  5. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a Consensus Statement from Brain Attack Coalition // Stroke. 2005. V. 36. P. 1597-1616.
  6. Lopez A.D., Mathers C.D., Ezzati M. et al. // Lancet. 2006. V. 367. P. 1747-1757.
  7. Goldstein L.B., Adams R., Alberts M.J. et al. // Stroke. 2006. V. 37. P. 1583-1633.
  8. Biller J., Feinberg W.M., Castaldo J.E. et al. // Stroke. 1998. V. 29. P. 554-562.
  9. Rothwell P.M., Coull A.J., Silver L.E. et al. // Lancet. 2005. V. 366. P. 1773-1783.
  10. Brainin M., Bornstein N. et al. // Eur. J. Neurol. 2000. V. 7. P. 5-10.
  11. European Stroke Initiative: European stroke initiative recommendations for stroke man-agement // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2000. V. 10. P. 335-351.
  12. The European Stroke Initiative Executive Committee and the EUSI Writing Committee: European stroke initiative recommendations for stroke management -update 2003 // Cerebro-vascular. Dis. 2003. V. 16. P. 311-337.
  13. Бахарев А.В. Диагностика стенозирующих поражений магистральных артерий головы минимально инвазивными методами: автореф. дис.. д-ра мед. наук. СПб., 2011.