Vol. 30 No. 3 (2026)
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASES

Technical considerations in robotic internal thoracic artery harvesting: a series of clinical cases

PDF (Русский) PDF HTML (Русский) JATS XML (Русский)
  • Roman N. Komarov,
  • Ilya V. Lutsenko,
  • Oleg O. Ognev,
  • Andrey N. Dzyundzia,
  • Nikolay O. Kurasov,
  • Lala Z. Faradzheva,
  • Sofia S. Kazakova,
  • Artem A. Romanovskii
Roman N. Komarov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Ilya V. Lutsenko
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Oleg O. Ognev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Andrey N. Dzyundzia
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Nikolay O. Kurasov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Lala Z. Faradzheva
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Sofia S. Kazakova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Artem A. Romanovskii
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2026-3-78-87

Published 2026-10-21

Keywords

  • internal thoracic artery; minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting; robotic surgery; surgical technique

How to Cite

Komarov, R. N., Ilya V. Lutsenko, I. V. ., Ognev, O. O., Dzyundzia, A. N. ., Kurasov, N. O., Faradzheva, L. Z. ., Kazakova, S. S. ., & Romanovskii, A. A. . (2026). Technical considerations in robotic internal thoracic artery harvesting: a series of clinical cases. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 30(3), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2026-3-78-87

Copyright (c) 2026 Komarov et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Introduction: One of the main trends in modern cardiac surgery is the reduction of the invasiveness of surgical procedures. Robotic technologies enable a broad range of operations to be performed without sternotomy, thereby accelerating patient recovery and
reducing the risk of postoperative complications.

Objective: To describe the essential steps and technical considerations
of robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) that ensure the convenience, safety, and reproducibility of this myocardial revascularization technique.

Methods: The technique of robot-assisted CABG described in this article is based on experience with 50 minimally invasive CABG procedures performed using robotic technology in the Cardiac Surgery Department of University Clinical Hospital No. 1. Most patients were men – 47 (94%). The median age was 63 years [59–66], with the largest
proportion of patients belonging to the 60–69-year age group (52%). The mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 5.6 kg/m². All procedures were performed electively, and no conversions were required.

Results: All surgical procedures were completed successfully. In three cases, the internal thoracic artery (ITA) was injured during mobilization. At the current stage of our program, we have adopted a strategy of limiting the robotic stage to ITA harvesting without performing the distal anastomosis. The modular structure of the learning process for totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) allows
each component of the procedure to be practiced sequentially. As our experience has accumulated, we have gradually expanded the scope of the intervention.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted CABG, in which the ITA is harvested robotically and the anastomosis is constructed through a thoracotomy, provides a reliable foundation for mastering and subsequently implementing complete TECAB. It is important to recognize that
outcomes improve as the surgical team gains relevant experience. Stepwise acquisition of robotic coronary surgery skills makes it possible to perform these procedures during the early stages of the learning curve without exposing patients to undue risk.

Received 26 November 2025. Revised 15 April 2026. Accepted 5 May 2026.

Informed consent
The patient’s informed consent to use the records for medical purposes is obtained.

Funding
The study did not have sponsorship.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to Polina A. Kovaleva, an operating room nurse in the Department of Minimally
Invasive and Robotic Cardiovascular Surgery, University Clinical Hospital No. 1, Sechenov University, for her high
level of professionalism and outstanding performance of her duties during high-technology surgical procedures.

Contribution of the authors
Conception and study design: R.N. Komarov, I.V. Lutsenko, O.O. Ognev

Data collection and analysis: I.V. Lutsenko, O.O. Ognev, L.Z. Faradzheva, S.S. Kazakova

Statistical analysis: I.V. Lutsenko, A.A. Romanovskii

Drafting the article: all authors

Critical revision of the article: R.N. Komarov, O.O. Ognev, A.N. Dzyundzia, N.O. Kurasov

Final approval of the version to be published: all authors

PDF (Русский) PDF HTML (Русский) JATS XML (Русский)

References

  1. Loulmet D., Carpentier A., D’Attellis N., Berrebi A., Cardon C., Ponzio O., Aupecle B., Relland J.Y. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118(1):4-10. PMID: 10384177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70133-9
  2. Algoet M., Melvin T., Cerny S., Bonatti J., Singh S., Folliguet T., Modi P., Franke U., Gianoli M., Agnino A., Casselman F., Oosterlinck W. How to advance from minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting to totally endoscopic coronary bypass grafting: challenges in Europe versus United States of America. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(5):397-408. PMID: 39434975; PMCID: PMC11491180. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-rcabg-0210
  3. Whellan D.J., McCarey M.M., Taylor B.S., Rosengart T.K., Wallace A.S., Shroyer A.L., Gammie J.S., Peterson E.D. Trends in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: A Study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, 2006 to 2012. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(1):140-6. PMID: 27016838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.059
  4. Gaudino M., Bakaeen F.G., Sandner S., Aldea G.S., Arai H., Chikwe J., Firestone S., Fremes S.E., Gomes W.J., Bong-Kim K., Kisson K., Kurlansky P., Lawton J., Navia D., Puskas J.D., Ruel M., Sabik J.F., Schwann T.A., Taggart D.P., Tatoulis J., Wyler von Ballmoos M. Expert systematic review on the choice of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;64(2):ezad163. PMID: 37535847. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad163
  5. Cheng N., Gao C., Yang M., Wu Y., Wang G., Xiao C. Analysis of the learning curve for beating heart, totally endoscopic, coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1832-6. PMID: 24629222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.002
  6. Bonatti J., Schachner T., Bernecker O., Chevtchik O., Bonaros N., Ott H., Friedrich G., Weidinger F., Laufer G. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(2):504-10. PMID: 14762361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.005
  7. Schachner T., Bonaros N., Wiedemann D., Weidinger F., Feuchtner G., Friedrich G., Laufer G., Bonatti J. Training surgeons to perform robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(2):523-7. PMID: 19632405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.087
  8. Bonatti J., Schachner T., Bonaros N., Rützler E., Weidinger F., Schistek R., Feuchtner G., Friedrich G., Pachinger O., Laufer G. Robotic technology-probably a safe tool for development of completely endoscopic coronary revascularization procedures. Innovations (Phila). 2008;3(3):139-41. PMID: 22436855. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e31817ea8ed
  9. de Cannière D., Wimmer-Greinecker G., Cichon R., Gulielmos V., Van Praet F., Seshadri-Kreaden U., Falk V. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(3):710-6. PMID: 17723822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.06.057
  10. Kim K.B., Hwang H.Y., Hahn S., Kim J.S., Oh S.J. A randomized comparison of the Saphenous Vein Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery as a Y-Composite Graft (SAVE RITA) trial: One-year angiographic results and mid-term clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(3):901-7. PMID: 24973924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.057
  11. Hemli J.M., Henn L.W., Panetta C.R., Suh J.S., Shukri S.R., Jennings J.M., Fontana G.P., Patel N.C. Defining the learning curve for robotic-assisted endoscopic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery. Innovations (Phila). 2013;8(5):353-8. PMID: 24346584. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000017
  12. Boutros C.S., Kim M.J., Diasty M.E. The learning curve of robotic cardiac surgery: a scoping review. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):476. PMID: 40788514; PMCID: PMC12339607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02427-w
  13. Gofus J., Cerny S., Shahin Y., Sorm Z., Vobornik M., Smolak P., Sethi A., Marcinov S., Karalko M., Chek J., Harrer J., Vojacek J., Pojar M. Robot-assisted vs. conventional MIDCAB: A propensity-matched analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:943076. PMID: 36110419; PMCID: PMC9468449. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCVM.2022.943076
  14. Jonsson A., Binongo J., Patel P., Wang Y., Garner V., Mitchell-Cooks D., Halkos M.E. Mastering the Learning Curve for Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2023;115(5):1118-1125. PMID: 36848999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.02.045
  15. Nisivaco S., Bhasin R., Kitahara H., Patel B., Coleman C., Grady K., Oh W.H., Balkhy H.H. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(4):354-363. PMID: 39157183; PMCID: PMC11327409. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0016
  16. Balkhy H.H., Nisivaco S.M., Hashimoto M., Torregrossa G., Grady K. Robotic Total Endoscopic Coronary Bypass in 570 Patients: Impact of Anastomotic Technique in Two Eras. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(2):476-482. PMID: 34890572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.10.049
  17. Zhou Z., Dilip K.A., Gleboff A., Nazem A., Green G.R., Cherney A., Lutz C.J. Comparison of Robot-Assisted Multivessel Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass and Hybrid Revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2023;2(2):226-230. PMID: 39790165; PMCID: PMC11708408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atssr.2023.11.029