Vol. 29 No. 3 (2025): Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES

Numerical modeling of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a fluid-structure interaction approach

Nikita Pil
Research Center for Genetics and Life Sciences, Sirius University
Alex G. Kuchumov
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет
Oleg Krestyaninov
Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Aleksey Baranov
Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Published 2025-12-18

Keywords

  • биомедицинский инжиниринг; математическое моделирование; аортальный стеноз; транскатетерная имплантация аортального клапана

How to Cite

Pil, N. ., Kuchumov, A. G. ., Krestyaninov, O. ., & Baranov, A. (2025). Numerical modeling of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a fluid-structure interaction approach. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya, 29(3), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2025-3-35-45

Abstract

Background: Nowafays, transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an effective method for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis in all surgical risk groups. Despite significant achievements, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation proceeding is often accompanied by a number of obstacles associated with suboptimal location of the bioprosthesis, its geometry and subsequent hydrodynamic disturbances.

Objective: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a comprehensive mathematical model taking into account fluid-structure interaction to simulate the hemodynamic characteristics of transcatheter aortic valves.

Methods: To construct a comprehensive model describing the hemodynamics of the aortic valve, the first step was to develop a geometric model including the aortic root, the valve frame, and the leaflet apparatus connected to the valve skirt. Next, the overall topic on modeling the flow and soft tissue response during valve placement was solved using the ALE formulation for fluid-structure interaction, which combines the Eulerian description of fluid motion with the Lagrangian description of solid deformation.

Results: Stress distributions in the valve frame and cusps were obtained. The highest stress occurred at the frame nodes and reach 270 MPa. The valve cusps were most susceptible to high stress in the inflection zone. Stress values ranged from 5–10 MPa. Furthermore, aortic wall dilation due to valve frame expansion was determined to be in the range of 0.6–1.2 mm and consistent with clinically observed values. The maximum flow velocity after surgery did not exceed 1.4 m/s that was within a range for healthy people.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates the possibility of using a comprehensive approach based on the fluid-structure interaction to simulate the hemodynamics of a transcatheter aortic valve bioprosthesis. The developed model covers both the anatomically correct geometry of the aortic root and valve elements, and realistic boundary conditions based on clinical echocardiography data and a physiological pressure profile that ensures high reliability of the numerical experiment. Thus, the presented methodological approach can be effectively used to assess and predict the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and optimize new designs of transcatheter aortic bioprostheses, analyze their interaction with the anatomical structures of the patient, as well as to reduce the risk of complications and increase the durability of prostheses.

References

  1. Persson M., Glaser N., Nilsson J., Friberg Ö., Franco-Cereceda A., Sartipy U. Comparison of long-term performance of bioprosthetic aortic valves in Sweden from 2003 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e220962. PMID: 35254431; PMCID: PMC8902647. https://doi.org/jamanetworkopen.2022.0962
  2. Kapoor A., Jepson N., Bressloff N.W., Loh P.H., RayT., Beier S.Theroad to the ideal stent: A review of stent design optimisation methods, findings, and opportunities. Mater Des. 2023;237(7):112556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112556
  3. Meier D., Landes U., Sondergaard L., De Backer O., Lutter G., Puehler T., Akodad M., Tzimas G., Blanke P., Payne G.W., Lai A., Gill H., Wood D.A., Webb J.G., Sellers S.L., Sathananthan J. Redo- TAVI with SAPIEN 3 in SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3 – impact of pre- and post-dilatation on final THV expansion. EuroIntervention. 2023;19(9):757-765. PMID: 37519190; PMCID: PMC10654765. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00308
  4. He R., Zhao L.G., Silberschmidt V.V., Liu Y., Vogt F. Patient-specific modelling of stent overlap: lumen gain, tissue damage and in- stent restenosis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;109:103836. PMID: 32543402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103836
  5. Eren O.C., Bressloff N.W. Leaflet stresses during crimping simulations of a CoreValve Evolut Pro model using a compression loading system. Biomedical Engineering Advances. 2024;8:100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2024.100130
  6. Hatoum H., Ahn S., Lilly S., Maureira P., Crestanello J., Thourani V.H., Dasi L.P. Flow dynamics of surgical and transcatheter aortic valves: Past to present. JTCVS Open. 2022;9:43-56. PMID: 36003460; PMCID: PMC9390780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.017
  7. Grossi B., Luraghi G., Barati S., Forte C., Gerosa L., Cozzi O., D’Ascenzo F., Condorelli G., Migliavacca F., Stefanini G. The impact of bicuspid valve morphology on the selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation devices: an in silico study. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025;3(1):qyaf018. PMID: 40041035; PMCID: PMC11879518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf018
  8. Leone P.P., Scotti A., Ho E.C., Assafin M., Doolittle J., Chau M., Slipczuk L., Levitus M., Regazzoli D., Mangieri A., Latib A. Prosthesis tailoring for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Clin Med. 2023;12(1):338. PMID: 36615141; PMCID: PMC9821207. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010338
  9. Grossi B., Barati S., Ramella A., Migliavacca F., Rodriguez Matas J.F., Dubini G., Chakfé N., Heim F., Cozzi O., Condorelli G., Stefanini G.G., Luraghi G. Validation evidence with experimental and clinical data to establish credibility of TAVI patient-specific simulations. Comput Biol Med. 2024;182:109159. PMID: 39303394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109159
  10. Liu X., Zhang W., Ye P., Luo Q., Chang Z. Fluid-structure interaction analysis on the influence of the aortic valve stent leaflet structure in hemodynamics. Front Physiol. 2022;13:904453. PMID: 35634139; PMCID: PMC9136298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.904453
  11. Wu M.C.H., Muchowski H.M., Johnson E.L., Rajanna M.R., Hsu M.C. Immersogeometric fluid-structure interaction modeling and simulation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;357:112556. PMID: 32831419; PMCID: PMC7442159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.07.025
  12. Brown J.A., Lee J.H., Smith M.A., Wells D.R., Barrett A., Puelz C., Vavalle J.P., Griffith B.E. Patient-specific immersed finite element-difference model of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(1):103-116. PMID: 36264408; PMCID: PMC9832092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03047-3
  13. Luraghi G., Migliavacca F., García-González A., Chiastra C., Rossi A., Cao D., Stefanini G., Rodriguez Matas J.F. On the modeling of patient-specific transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a fluid-structure interaction approach. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2019;10(3):437-455. PMID: 31309527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00427-0
  14. Bahadormanesh N., Tomka B., Abdelkhalek M., Khodaei S., Maftoon N., Keshavarz-Motamed Z. A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8033. PMID: 37198194; PMCID: PMC10192526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33511-6
  15. Shen X., Xu Y., Li H., Wang L., Sun P., Liu Q., Chen J., He Z. Mechanical behaviors of a new elliptical valve stent in bicuspid aortic valve. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024;250:108173. PMID: 38615386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108173
  16. McGee O.M., Gunning P.S., McNamara A., McNamara L.M. The impact of implantation depth of the Lotus™ valve on mechanical stress in close proximity to the bundle of His. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019;18(1):79-88. PMID: 30128675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1069-9
  17. Pan X.G., Corpuz A.M., Rajanna M.R., Johnson E.L. Parameterization, algorithmic modeling, and fluid-structure interaction analysis for generative design of transcatheter aortic valves. Eng Comput. 2024;40(6):3405-3427. PMID: 39678645; PMCID: PMC11639685. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00366-024-01973-5
  18. Liu X., Fan J., Mortier P., He Y., Zhu Q., Guo Y., Lin X., Li H., Jiang J., Rocatello G., Oliveira V., Dezutter T., Sondergaard L., Wang J. Sealing behavior in transcatheter bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves replacement through patient-specific computational modeling. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:732784. PMID: 34708088; PMCID: PMC8542706. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fcvm.2021.732784
  19. Liu X., Zhang W., Ye P., Luo Q., Chang Z. Fluid-structure interaction analysis on the influence of the aortic valve stent leaflet structure in hemodynamics. Front Physiol. 2022;13:904453. PMID: 35634139; PMCID: PMC9136298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.904453
  20. Qiu D., Barakat M., Hopkins B., Ravaghi S., Azadani A.N. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid valves: The synergistic effects of eccentric and incomplete stent deployment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;121:104621. PMID: 34130079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104621
  21. Simonato M., Webb J., Kornowski R., Vahanian A., Frerker C., Nissen H., Bleiziffer S., Duncan A., Rodés-Cabau J., Attizzani G.F., Horlick E., Latib A., Bekeredjian R., Barbanti M., Lefevre T., Cerillo A., Hernández J.M., Bruschi G., Spargias K., Iadanza A., Brecker S., Palma J.H., Finkelstein A., Abdel-Wahab M., Lemos P., Petronio A.S., Champagnac D., Sinning J.M., Salizzoni S., Napodano M., Fiorina C., Marzocchi A., Leon M., Dvir D.Transcatheter replacement of failed bioprosthetic valves: large multicenter assessment of the effect of implantation depth on hemodynamics after aortic valve-in-valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(6):e003651. PMID: 27301396. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003651
  22. Pasta S., Gandolfo C. Computational analysis of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves. Biomechanics. 2021;1(1):43-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics1010004
  23. Andersen H.R. How transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was born: the struggle for a new invention. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:722693. PMID: 34660724; PMCID: PMC8511628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.722693
  24. Pil N., Kuchumov A.G. Algorithmic generation of parameterized geometric models of the aortic valve and left ventricle. Sensors. 2024;25(1):11. PMID: 39796802; PMCID: PMC11722726. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010011
  25. Pil N., Kuchumov A.G., Kadyraliev B.K., Arutunyan V. Influence of aortic valve leaflet material model on hemodynamic features in healthy and pathological states. Mathematics. 2023;11(2):428. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020428
  26. Bosi G.M., Capelli C., Cheang M.H., Delahunty N., Mullen M., Taylor A.M., Schievano S. Population-specific material properties of the implantation site for transcatheter aortic valve replacement finite element simulations. J Biomech. 2018;71:236-244. PMID: 29482928; PMCID: PMC5889787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.017
  27. Овчаренко Е.А., Онищенко П.С., Клышников К.Ю., Ганю- ков В.И., Шилов А.А., Верещагин И.Е., Коков А.Н., Тарасов Р.С., Борисов В.Г., Захаров Ю.Н., Барбараш Л.С. Численное моделирование гемодинамики при повторном протезировании клапана сердца. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2019;23(3):30-38. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2019-3-30-38 Ovcharenko E.A., Onishchenko P.S., Klyshnikov K.Yu., Ganyukov V.I., Shilov A.A., Vereshchagin I.E., Kokov A.N., Tarasov R.S., Borisov V.G., Zakharov Y.N., Barbarash L.S. Numerical modelling of redo of the prosthetic heart valve: hemodynamics. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya = Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2019;23(3):30-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2019-3-30-38
  28. Capelli C., Bosi G.M., Cerri E., Nordmeyer J., Odenwald T., Bonhoeffer P., Migliavacca F., Taylor A.M., Schievano S. Patient- specific simulations of transcatheter aortic valve stent implantation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012;50(2):183-92. PMID: 22286953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0864-1
  29. Pil N., Selivanov G., Seleznev M., Pandelani T., Krestyaninov O., Nemavhola F., Kuchumov A.G. Current trends in transcatheter aortic valve implantation modelling and simulation. Series on Biomechanics. 2025;39(2):3-23. https://doi.org/10.7546/SB.01.02.2025
  30. Пиль Н.Е., Кучумов А.Г. Отслеживание траекторий движе- ния створок аортального клапана с использованием данных эхокардиографии. Российский журнал биомеханики. 2024;28(4):159-168. https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2024.4.14 Pil N.E., Kuchumov A.G. Aortic valve leaflets motion trajectories tracking by using echocardiography data. Russian Journal of Biomechanics. 2024;28(4):137-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2024.4.14